Audiokarma.org
Audiokarma Featured Sponsor

Go Back   AudioKarma.org Home Audio Stereo Discussion Forums > Turntables


We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-27-2009, 04:00 PM
bmorril2 bmorril2 is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9
Question BIC turntable,any good?

Looking at what seems to be 70's belt drive BIC turntable(BIC 960 ) in very good shape,just don't seem to remember them much . Any thoughts on quality ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2009, 04:21 PM
beatcomber's Avatar
beatcomber beatcomber is online now
AK Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lexington, Massachusetts
Posts: 13,184
There are a couple of recent BIC threads here - check it out!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-27-2009, 04:30 PM
markl markl is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Imperial, Missouri
Posts: 138
I like the BIC's a lot, I have the 960 and 940 and they both work like new. There seems to be a growing number of AKer's who are giving them a chance. They have much better sound than what you would expect from them. You'll still get the occasional snob who can't resist posting on here about how their newer TT (that cost 10 times more) totally walked all over their bic, there's always someone out their who has to bring us down. But for free or under a hundred bucks it's hard to beat.
I'ts a belt changer(the first) and manual TT that brings no rumble to the music. The platters are usually frozen in grease that has turned to glue. If this is the case "Do not try to turn the platter", you have pry straight up and you may need heat applied to the spindle hole(remove the 2 plastic pieces that make up the mat first and then insert a soldering iron per Fred Longworth). Once these tables are cleaned and relubed they are very dependable and a much better changer system than those dual umbrella spindles.
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-27-2009, 06:13 PM
mhardy6647's Avatar
mhardy6647 mhardy6647 is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New England
Posts: 44,924
meh
__________________
Preamps need drive, not gain. - G. Kaufman
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-27-2009, 06:27 PM
Nakdoc's Avatar
Nakdoc Nakdoc is offline
nakamichi spoken here
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,907
The 960 is a fine table. The arm is better than one might imagine. I have extra spindles if you need one.
__________________
A stereo can work and it can play.

SOTA Sapphire, Lustre arm, AKG mc
Yamaha C85 , C1
Carver TX-11a
Kenwood L-07MmkII , Yamaha B1 + UC1
DCM Time Windows ADS 200 IMF TLS80
Revox B77 Nak 680 pioneer CLD97
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 01-27-2009, 06:34 PM
terra1's Avatar
terra1 terra1 is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 5,339
I have a 980 which I took out of storage after 20+ years. It needed a new belt. That was all.

Lubed it anyway. Don't use WD40 around the tonearm pivots and area. You can dissolve the damping grease. Tonearm will drop like a rock.

I chose it because it got good reviews for value and had decent specs.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-27-2009, 07:25 PM
beatcomber's Avatar
beatcomber beatcomber is online now
AK Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lexington, Massachusetts
Posts: 13,184
I'm currently fixing up a 980 that I got for FREE on Craig's List.

My first table was either a 940 or 960, back in '77.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-27-2009, 08:25 PM
eb2jim's Avatar
eb2jim eb2jim is offline
AK Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,251
I have a couple of 980s - one was a basket case that I nursed back. They are really great turntables, and they "sound" good. I had a Thorens 165 as my main turntable for years. When I got my first 980 at a yard sale I figured it would be a fun one for my office, but after cleaning it up and giving it some real basic lubing it has become my main one. I sold the Thorens, and have no regrets. And if I drag out the 45s, I can stack them.

I got a 920 for free, and have been having a fun time rehabing that. It is pretty peculiar. The seem to be a weird mix of BIC and other makes parts. The tonearm is a Philips - same as on a 212/312.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-27-2009, 08:38 PM
KentTeffeteller's Avatar
KentTeffeteller KentTeffeteller is offline
Gimpus Stereophilus!
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Athens, TN
Posts: 18,297
This is a good BIC model along with it's higher end sibling. BIC didn't have the first belt drive changer. V-M had the first belt drive changer. BIC purchased the V-M Corporation belt drive changer design when they lost the import rights to Garrard changers from England back in the day. The 960 and 980 were V-M designed and V-M assisted BIC with setting up production.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.



Friends of Audiokarma
We appreciate your help in keeping this site going.
Stereo Repair World
Herbies Audio Lab
Vintage Home Audio
Amps and Sound
Pro DJ Headphones - click here
Organ Donor Parts
Wargos Electronics
Parts Connexion
Sonneteer
Take Five Audio
Sound Stage Direct
Audio Salon
AudioClassics
Audience AV
AV Solutions
Simply Speakers
Tone Arm Audio
BD Enterprise
Musical Paradise
Howard Products
Classic Sound Repair
FM DX Antenna
McIntosh Cabinets
Siliconray
BOI Audio Works
Vinyl Magic Record Cleaner
Amplifiedparts
Grant Fidelity
RSL Speakers
Yesterday's Audio
Urban Antigue Radio
DeWick Repairs
Many Moons Audio
Vintage Electronics Repair
The Tube Store
Politicalchat.org
Audio Doctor
Antique Radio Classifieds
MCM Electronics
Videokarma.org
   
   
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ęCopyright 2002-2014 AudioKarma.org, All rights reserved.